✓
large offshore assets offer more significant opportunities for redevelopment
-
complex geology lends itself to finding additional reserves
-
reserves de-risked over time in many cases without additional CAPEX
​
✓
offshore crude oil-centric assets typically have
-
lower decline rates
-
substantial rates of cash flow from operations
-
revenues unaffected by local market forces
✓
the worldwide playing field opens up opportunities to acquire under-valued, under-
exploited assets of major oil companies
-
shortage of offshore capable players due to industry/capital shift to onshore shale
plays -
higher cost of entry requirements - operational excellence, financial strength
-
existing asset teams lack resources of capital and/or are stuck in “harvest” mode
✓
the US Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) provides a stable business environment for investment
-
predictable legal, regulatory and fiscal framework
-
world-class infrastructure coupled with abundant service providers
-
highly competitive market without dominant players
-
highly attractive drilling economics with developments looking for capital partners
✓
equity and capital infusion toward unconventional shale (resource) plays have created market discontinuities in terms of
-
competition for positions in the best shale plays has over-heated
-
some legacy conventional plays assets becoming stranded, under-capitalized
-
publicly traded companies are no longer the “natural owner” of these smaller assets
✓
the perceived no-risk “manufacturing process” of resource plays was proven false
-
not all rock is the same
-
over-extension of lines of credit led to multiple bankruptcies
✓
the “Energy Transition” is proving to take decades, not years
-
crude oil assets will be needed for substantially longer than anticipated

